Talk:Winslow Homer Studio

National Register of Historic Places High‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Maine Mid‑importance

	Maine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Maine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Maine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MaineWikipedia:WikiProject MaineTemplate:WikiProject MaineMaine articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Photos

Photos and/or photo uploads are needed.

HABS or HAER photos may be available for this site (although are not found just now in a quick search). Search HABS/HAER here
Two of photos accompanying NRHP document (linked in article) are taken by NPS employee, hence public domain and can be used. Search NPS focus here, please select the highest resolution JPG versions
New photos would be helpful.

Just returned from the Maine coast, camera in hand, but as of 10/5/08, the entrance to Winslow Homer Road was gated, with a "no passing" sign restricting access to homeowners and friends. There are press photos at http://www.portlandmuseum.org/Content/174.shtml which would seem to fall under the category of "promotional photos". I can't find a clear policy on Wikipedia as to whether this class of image qualifies as fair use.Barte (talk) 16:39, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I could see a case being made for using two of the pre-restoration photos (one outside, one inside) in this article, since those are unlikely to be replicable. I have pictures of the restored interior and exterior (I went on the tour.) Magic♪piano 22:02, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]